COMPARATIVE ESSAY FINAL333

Rural Living versus Urban Living
Name
Institution
Professor
Course
Date







Several individuals are the concern with the choice of the best place to live between the rural and the urban areas. They have a tough choice in comparing the difference between the rural and the urban life. The nature of the standard of living is the primary issue in contrasting between the rural living and the urban living. When making a choice on the best area between the rural and the urban life, it is necessary to consider their similarities and their differences. The crucial factors like the capacity to make the informed choice, employment capacity, health, diversity all affect the two sides of the comparison, and even though the two sides gives a great significance, they both have the equal number of the drawbacks. The rural and the urban living share the same similarity regarding the human interactions, but they both differs widely when it comes to the diversity and the choice of some or all the issues.
Rural and urban livings are similar regarding the human interactions. In the rural and the urban areas, there are some of the positive and also the negative factors that contribute to the individual level of the satisfaction. If there is any expression to be made on issues relating to the urban way of life ,is on the various decisions and the type of the qualities. In urban ranges, there are several individuals who make the decisions concerning their way of life . For example, in urban territories, one will probably have an opportunity to find out on the broad range on the food and the health provision hence they have a better living standard as compared to those in the rural settings (Komiya,2016). Also, those in urban zones have a great opportunity as they will get to intermingle with the people from different cultures and attend different social events as they have a massive rundown to choose from. Thus they have an access to be more cultured and will probably have the different experience due to the contact of peoples fromthose from different class, cultural, and ethnic groupings. The parents will have the several options which are available for the entire education of their kids and select from a wide range of the public and the private schools in the area which leads to the great capability of the children to perform. One also will choose from the variety of the employment in the urban areas since there are several organizations and the companies. They also have the white choice of the health care services and a wide range of the doctors to choose from. The rural population is considered as much secured as there is no robbery as compared to the urban places. The rural population indicates a poorer healthy as compared to the urban areas regarding the general healthy indicators and the factors like the vehicle's accident and the overweight (Komiya, 2016). This came as a result of the less dependence on the vehicles in the rural areas as well as more emphasize on the walking. There are less pollution and the congestion in the rural areas hence making the place to be serene. These two places of living not only have peoples living in poverty but also that they have individuals living a quality life.
Both the Rural and Urban Societies contain jobless and peoples living in poverty. There is the absence of the day to day stress which is common in the urban areas as a result of the external factors like insecurity. While there may not be countless and stores to look over, those in rural areas have the advantage of land after that to develop their nourishment, which is substantially healthier. Even though the urban areas have a greater social network and the type of the networking activities, the rural population gives the residents the chance to acquire long lasting and very personal kinds of relationships. This is because there is the regular encounter of the same peoples (Komiya, 2016). Despite the limited number of schools in the rural areas to choose from in rural areas, they lack enough funding, but the children grow up developing the personal relationship with their classmates.
The rural spots don't offer a similar level of decision and in exceptionally isolated zones and one may be compelled to drive long separations to discover even a remote selection of the different qualities found in urban focuses. Still, in spite of this absence of a decision, there are various positive sides to rural living as far as personal satisfaction is the concern. For example, living in rural areas permits inhabitants to appreciate the normal world more efficiently as opposed to going to parks. Also, individuals don't need to battle with the everyday worries of urban life, for example, being stuck in movement, managing higher rates of wrongdoing, and much of the time paying higher charges (Komiya,2016). These unlucky deficiencies of stressors can significantly affect the general personal satisfaction.
One of the disadvantages to living in rural areas, nevertheless, is that not at all like urban territories, occupants don't have the best chance to look through a scope of work alternatives. While they can drive to bigger towns, this gets costly and is not as advantageous as working near their living arrangement. In general, if there is any announcement to be made about the personal satisfaction of country living, it is that there is a more prominent capacity to interface with individuals and the scene. The personal satisfaction in urban ranges is like that in rural zones in that both include a high level of socialization, regardless of the possibility that is on a quicker level. Where they contrast most detectable is in the accessibility of decisions and differing qualities, particularly when fundamental elements (social insurance, training, and work choices) are concerned.





Reference
Komiya, A., Oishi, S., & Lee, M. (2016), The Rural–Urban Difference in Interpersonal Regret, Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 42(4), 513-525.





RURAL VS. URBAN LIVING 3

Running Head: RURAL VS.URBAN LIVING 1