Case Myanmar

1


Case n° 02/2015:
Myanmar (Burma)

HONOURABLE JURY OF INTERNATIONAL BUDDHIST ETHICS COMMITTEE (IBEC) & BUDDHIST TRIBUNAL ON HUMAN RIGHTS (BTHR)
P R E S E N T . -
In the presence of the President and Spiritual Guide of the IBEC-BTHR Buddhist Master Maitreya, and the Executive Secretary of the IBEC-BTHR Master Yan MaitrI-Shi, it is addressed the case of GENOCIDE denounced by the World Association of Buddhism (WBA) against Myanmar.-

I, Sekkha Dhamma, as Prosecutor of IBEC and BTHR, acknowledge the hard and organized labour performed for the comprehensive compilation of Evidence in this case, similarly, I appreciate the contribution of them for the analysis concerning the Party I represent. That said, with all due respect I appear to expose:
Being received the list of digital media that were gathered, ordered and at the same time confirmed in their order and context as Evidence by the Executive Secretary of the IBEC and BTHR Master Yan Maitri-Shi, I give way to the Third Stage of Procedure called "EVALUATION OF EVIDENCE ", same one that is stated in the Constitutive Act of the IBEC and BTHR in order to know, establish, dictate and determine the Responsibility of actions and omissions committed by Myanmar (Burma), by the Government of the President Thein Sein, Police and Security Forces and Extremist Buddhist Groups, against Muslim Populations of the Arakan State. This Accusation of GENOCIDE is a Requirement performed by the WORLD ASSOCIATION OF BUDDHISM in the field of the Buddhist Ethics and Human Rights, an act which follows below:

EVALUATION OF EVIDENCE
FIRST EVALUATION.- By being the core part of this procedure, it is necessary to point out the Evidence Means offered by the Executive Secretary of the IBEC and BTHR Master Yan Maitri- Shi, and formally present them to the Jury for their knowledge, which are composed of 29 Evidence that proves the motivating Accusation of the current process, entitled with the Violation, Unlawfulness or corresponding Crime against Buddhist Spirituality and Human Rights, acts perpetrated in Myanmar (Burma) by the Government of President Thein Sein, Police and Security Forces and Extremist Buddhist Groups against Muslim Populations of the Arakan State. These Evidences, which mostly come from written or audiovisual testimonies, are listed below:

EVIDENCE 1: Validity of the Buddhist Committee and Tribunal
EVIDENCE 2: Police Indifference
EVIDENCE 3: Lack of Liberty
EVIDENCE 4: Case of ethnic cleansing
EVIDENCE 5: Anti-Muslim Rhetoric
EVIDENCE 6: Law that prohibits marriage between religions
EVIDENCE 7: failure to prevent genocide
EVIDENCE 8: Crimes against humanity
EVIDENCE 9: Complicity of the government
EVIDENCE 10: Campaign of ethnic cleansing
EVIDENCE 11: Testimonies of mass graves
EVIDENCE 12: Rohingya Testimonies about genocide
EVIDENCE 13: Escape of the Rohingyas
EVIDENCE 14: Concentration camps
EVIDENCE 15: Negation of Citizenship
EVIDENCE 16: Negation of Nationality to Rohingyas
EVIDENCE 17: Rohingyas excluded from the National Population Census
EVIDENCE 18: Deportation and forced population transfers
EVIDENCE 19: Persecution
EVIDENCE 20: Terror along with ethnic cleansing
EVIDENCE 21: Social Segregation
EVIDENCE 22: Slow genocide against the Rohingyas
EVIDENCE 23: Violence against innocent people
EVIDENCE 24: Racial segregation and genocide
EVIDENCE 25: Lack of attention regarding health and nutrition
EVIDENCE 26: Torture
EVIDENCE 27: Destruction of Muslim stores and buildings
EVIDENCE 28: Riots perpetrated by Buddhists
EVIDENCE 29: State Terrorism.-

SECOND EVALUATION.- Of the Tests provided there is no doubt about the authenticity of them, considering its origin, because in them lies Testimony or Declaration of World Organizations that watch over Human Rights as is the case of HUMAN RIGHTS WATCH; with the rest of the Evidence, each testimony compiled comes from an internet link where it is found the corresponding information that supports and strengthens the evidence through a news article.
Regarding all articles that are offered as a proof they are also labelled the actions and omissions perpetrated in Myanmar as terrible faults towards Buddhist Ethics and a clear Violation of Human Rights, (this without prejudice that at the same time the constituent elements of Crimes and their Criminal Responsibility are configured, case that does not concern to jurisdictionally decide on this matter by our Party), there is no objection, disqualification or validation of the digital content by the Party which I represent, by virtue of these are digital media derived from reliable sources and that also were formally and openly published at the time about acts, facts, events and statements reflected in writing and in video, from which there is no doubt about their authenticity and veracity, even more so when they were not legal appeals lodged, statements or clarifications for disclaimer, expressed and direct inconformity regarding what was published, the right of reply exercised or give rise to an investigation into the origin, reputation and veracity of what is expressed by public information means; this in charge of Myanmar (Burma), by the Government of President Thein Sein, Police and Security Forces and Buddhist Extremist Groups against Muslim Populations of the Arakan State.-

THIRD EVALUATION.- Regarding what was exposed, published, declared and reproduced in the media and organisms in defence of Human Rights that are now presented as digital Evidence for this case by the Executive Secretary of the IBEC and BTHR Master Yan Maitri-Shi, these proofs are determined by the Party I represent as Prosecutor of IBEC and BTHR as LEGITIMATE and VALID, evidences that sustain and confirm the Indictment presented by the WORLD ASSOCIATION OF BUDDHISM (WBA) concerning the Crime of GENOCIDE and multiple Violations of Human Rights

which in turn are consummated into Crimes, and into Violations against the Buddhist Ethics perpetrated in detriment of the Muslim people called Rohingya, residents of the Arakan State in Myanmar (Burma).-
In such a situation, it begins the Stage Four of the Procedure called "REPLY", in which is set the term of 5 (five) days to the Accused and Requested Party Myanmar (Burma), in order that it emits the Reply they wish or corresponds to them facing the Indictment and Requirement with respect to the Evidence provided, accepted and valued by this writing.-

Sekkha Dhamma
Prosecutor of IBEC & BTHR
México April, 2015 (two thousand fifteen).-


International Buddhist Ethics Committee (IBEC) Buddhist Tribunal on Human Rights (BTHR)