2016 US Presidential Race: Two Cuban Americans and a Reality Show Star Walk into a Bar
Descripción
2016 US Presidential Race: Two Cuban Americans and a Reality Show Star Walk into a Bar By Evren Çelik Wiltse Assistant Professor, South Dakota State University The strange and convoluted candidate selection system in the US keeps puzzling the rest of the world. In the 2016 presidential race, the process delivered some rather unconventional candidates. Essentially, we are observing 50 small races at each state, before the parties nominate their candidates in their national convention. The mini races at the state level (called primaries or caucuses) serve to allocate delegates in the national convention of each party. Iowa, New Hampshire and South Carolina are states that start the race relatively early. Presidential candidates who can have strong showing in these early states tend to carry this wind and begin dominating the arena in the later states. Normally, these early elections at each state are sufficiently open to the general public. One can register and vote the same day in caucuses and primaries. However, despite this “open door” policy, political parties have historically been able to steer the voter choices. They can do so by using the party networks and incumbents (governors, senators, representatives) to mobilize voter support. Consequently, despite these “open primaries”, parties still had decisive role in who the nominees would be. This year however, things are somewhat different. The Republican electorate seems rather upset and angry with the establishment. Fearful of a populist backlash, the Republican elites did not openly throw their weight behind a single candidate. While Jeb Bush enjoyed a certain degree of support, it was not sufficient push him ahead. After spending some $130 million in his election campaign, Jeb Bush pulled out of the race after South Carolina. Unlike previous years, outside candidates are making significant progress this year. Normally, outside candidates would have serious disadvantages. They would neither have the financial support of the Republican establishment, nor the name recognition. However, when we look at the candidates this year, outsiders are doing remarkably well in the primaries and caucuses. How can we explain this anomaly? Donald Trump: The Reality Star-‐Turned-‐Presidential Frontrunner Trump has a rather unique status compared to the other candidates. Even though he is a political outsider, he does not suffer from the usual disadvantages of the outsider status. Having marketed his own name in real estate and later in reality shows for decades, he enjoys universal name recognition. He has sufficient funds to finance his own election campaign. In fact, he rejects outside money. Moreover, he has mastered the use of all forms of media. Even though he is criticized by the elites
for his inflammatory and racist rhetoric, his simplistic vocabulary and scandalous policy proposals, state after state, Trump keeps winning. From a name-‐recognition perspective, Jeb Bush also had significant advantages. But Trump was able to run Bush to the ground, largely through effective use of rhetoric. Almost every time he mentioned Jeb Bush’s name, Trump used adjectives like “weak”, “soft” and “low-‐energy”. Despite coming from a massive political dynasty and having solid support from the Republican establishment, Jeb Bush couldn’t show any meaningful success in the first few primaries. He couldn’t even make it to the top three. After spending millions in campaigning, yet not persuading the Republicans away from Trump, Jeb Bush eventually decided to drop out of the race in South Carolina. Trump introduced a whole new set of vocabulary into political campaigning. Opponent bashing reached to whole new levels during the Trump campaign. Trump called Republican contender Ted Cruz a “maniac” who doesn’t have the “right temperament for presidency”. Referring to the only female candidate on GOP side, Carly Fiorina, Trump said the following: “Look at that face! Would anyone vote for that?” Trump offends not only people but also nations. He was particularly harsh against Mexico. On several occasions, he criticized NAFTA by saying, “they get our jobs, and we get their criminals and rapists”. If elected, he plans to deport approximately 11 million illegal immigrants and build a massive wall along the Mexican border, which will be paid by the Mexican government. Muslims do not get any gentle treatment either. Trump openly said that he would consider banning Muslims from entering the US. Despite his extreme rhetoric, he seems to be the solid front-‐runner for the Republican Party. But who are the Trump supporters? Many think that the poor, lesser educated and disenchanted white population rushes to Trump. In fact, in a recent victory speech, Trump said he loves them all, particularly “the poorly educated!” A public opinion survey conducted in December 2015 under the auspices of the University of Massachusetts sheds light to the Trump phenomenon. This empirical study shows that income, race, education or religion do not play significant role in distinguishing the Trump supporters from rest of Republicans. That is, Trump supporters are not any poorer or less educated than Cruz or Rubio supporters. What distinguishes the Trump supporters is that, they are more prone to authoritarianism. In general, authoritarian personalities prefer strong, charismatic leaders and control. As such, Trump’s rhetoric about the wall against Mexico, control over borders, “making America great again” strongly resonate with this authoritarian voter profile.
Trump has some important handicaps when it comes to appealing the core conservative base of the Republicans. Even though he mentions family values and religion in his campaign, his own biography is hard to brush aside. Being from New York, he is known to be more liberal on women’s rights in the past. Trump has also married three times, twice with foreign national super models. It is difficult to reconcile his past with his conservative and anti-‐immigrant rhetoric today. Ted Cruz: The Slipper Slope to Theocracy Ted Cruz could be described at the candidate that is diametrically opposite of Trump. Cruz gained the national spotlight after winning the first caucus in Iowa. He has strong following among the religious Republicans, particularly the Evangelicals. His father is a rather extreme preacher in Texas. When explaining how he decided to run for president, Cruz told the reporters that they had hours long prayer session at his father’s church, and finally when they were all on their knees, waiting for a signal from God, “God spoke to his wife, Heidi”, and apparently said “Go for it!” In short, Cruz believes some divine signal compelled him to run for the 2016 presidential race. When elected, Ted Cruz wants to eliminate the separation of the church and state in the US. He is trained as a lawyer, supposedly knows the Constitution and has argued cases in front of the US Supreme Court. Yet, it is difficult to understand how he can push for a merger of state and religion, when the US Constitution explicitly bans endorsement of of any religion by the state and public authorities. Marco Rubio: The Last Exit before the bridge Finally, Marco Rubio is the young and relatively inexperienced candidate on the Republican side. Both his parents fled from Cuba and settled in Miami. Unlike Cruz, Rubio had a less privileged upbringing. Yet, both Cruz and Rubio are adamantly against Cuba and Castro. They want to reverse all the positive diplomatic steps that were initiated by President Obama. Both the Republican establishment and large Republican donors were supporting Jeb Bush at the beginning of the race. However, after Jeb Bush stepped down, party establishment is gradually moving towards Rubio. So far, Republican Senators seem to be turned off by the extremely xenophobic rhetoric of Trump and the radical-‐ religious rhetoric of Cruz. Consequently, Rubio seems to be the only viable, middle of the ground candidate. Yet his young age, lack of charismatic appeal, protectionist stance in foreign affairs, and inconsistent record in the Senate seem to be significant hurdles. Given this strange batch of candidates, the race is getting increasingly more desperate. One of the recent campaign slogans is: “Anyone but Trump!” Republicans are having an uphill battle to find a sensible candidate.
Republican Candidates & Their Positions on Major Policy Issues: Donald Trump Ted Cruz Marco Rubio Short Born in New York, Cuban father American Both parents from biography: German-‐Scottish mother, born in Cuba, grew up in Miami ancestors, real estate Calgary Canada, grew & Las Vegas, University developer father, up in Texas, Harvard of Miami Law School Wharton School of Law School graduate, graduate, married, 4 Business Graduate, married, 2 kids. kids. married 3 times, 5 kids. Religion& Previously expressed Defended to preserve Supports traditional moral issues liberal opinions, but “under God” in the family values, churches, currently highlights his Pledge, on Texas Ten civil society Christian background, Commandments family values monument & in Texas schools; against abortion, against same-‐sex marriage Guns “No one can chip away Staunch supporter of Believes rights to bear the 2nd Amendment 2nd amendment, arms is a fundamental rights!” “absolutely no gun right, voted to block control!” background checks to buy guns Immigration “No border, no country!” Build a wall, triple 700 miles of Wall on Will build a wall to stop border security, use south border, entry-‐exit illegal immigration. biometric tracking to visa tracking system, $4 Mexico will pay for the end illegal billion for new cameras Wall. Approximately 11 immigration; 5 year & censors at the border million illegal minimum sentence to immigrants will be those who enter deported illegally Foreign policy: Stronger military “Rip up Iran deal”; End Obama’s Cuba presence, especially in strongly side with “concessions”, put Cuba East and South China Israel, reject refugees back to state sponsors Seas from “terrorist-‐ridden” of terrorism list, no regions, recognize refugees to be accepted governors authority to from Syria refuse their resettlement Economy, Simplify tax code, no 10% flat tax, “repeal Stop China from Taxes taxes from anyone every word of undermining US making $25,000 a year; Obamacare” economy, taxes from cut corporate tax rate to small business cut to 15% 25%, repeal Obamacare
Lihat lebih banyak...
Comentarios