How to Participate in Critique
Descripción
Bruce Mackh, PhD
Whenever we perceive an object, we engage in
varying levels of criticism and critique.
This happens immediately, unconsciously,
emotionally, and intellectually.
Encounter Judge Interpret Analyze Evaluate
The audience member is confronted by an object*
The encounter may last only a moment. The
audience then chooses either to:
Continue to attend to the object—OR— Disregard the object.
*object: anything perceivable by the senses, such as an image, text, performance, event, or artifact
We make an immediate decision about:
whether we’re interested in the object and/or whether we like or dislike the object.
Our reaction is spontaneous and qualitative:
It is based on prior knowledge, experience, personality or
taste; It is emotional/intuitive, not logical/rational.
We make intuitive connections between the object
and our personal experience or prior knowledge.
These connections allow us to identify the object and
perceive its message or meaning.
If we have no prior knowledge or experience,
interpretation fails. We cannot understand the object or perceive the message.
Once we think we understand the object and have
discerned its meaning, we refine our judgment and interpretation by looking more closely.
At this stage of the process intellect is engaged,
emotion is scaled back, and we can consider external data and information linked to the object.
If no additional input is available, we might choose to
seek it through a third source (informal research to enhance comprehension).
Although judgment is an immediate and emotional
reaction to the object, evaluation is the intellectual, deliberate formation of an informed, rational opinion regarding the object.
As the result of interpretation and analysis, evaluation
may contradict judgment: what we first judged negatively may receive a positive evaluation or vice-‐versa.
Evaluation typically takes more time than prior levels of
the critique process.
Encounter: the artist presents the work and we all
consider it carefully.
Judge: we form a first impression of the work.
Interpret: we look more closely and decide what we
think the artist was trying to communicate.
Analyze: we consider the elements and principles of
art as they apply to this particular creative product.
Evaluate: we think about our analysis and prepare to
comment on the artist’s work.
Be honest, but not unkind. Try to frame your remarks using
positive language whenever possible.
Be certain to provide a reason or explanation for every
comment. Avoid unsupported opinions or empty statements such as, “You did a really good job” or “I don’t like it.”
Focus on the artist’s application of craft, technique, process,
and presentation and how these aspects affect the communication of the artist’s message or purpose in the work.
Focus on the artwork, not the artist.
Encounter: without speaking, closely observe the collage as a whole. Judge: determine whether your first impression is favorable or unfavorable. Interpret: look more deeply at the work and attempt to discern the artist’s
message, the meaning of the work, or its intended purpose.
Analyze: Consider issues of craft, technique, process, and presentation. Has
this work been rendered with skill? Is the meaning or message clearly represented by the work? Which of the elements or principles of art are the most or least effective in this work? (see next slide)
Evaluate: Do you feel that this collage effectively communicates the artist’s
message? Why or why not? What is the most successful aspect of this collage? What is the least successful aspect of this collage? How would you recommend that it be improved, if at all?
Line
Pattern
Shape
Rhythm/movement
Color
Proportion/scale
Value
Balance
Form
Unity/harmony
Texture
Emphasis
Space/perspective
Contrast
Considering the Elements and Principles of Art is especially helpful when reflecting for the purpose of critique. And, remember, practice makes perfect…or thereabouts.
Lihat lebih banyak...
Comentarios